Welcome to the wiki HW space for 4th marking period. Our goals are:
to develop independent research skills
to improve your analytical skills
to maximize our talents in/through group work
to have more fun as we learn!
Wiki Essential Questions
How can I approach this problem creatively? (hint: Wikipedia is not creative)
How can I work with my classmates to construct best answer?
What makes a good answer? (What makes an answer good?)
How should I be graded?
How can I help the wiki be effective as a teaching and learning tool?
___
Rubric
Evidence (5 point scale)
5. Outstanding--Primary Sources with expert analysis
4. Strong--Secondary source(s) or expert analysis
3. Meets Standard--Quote from Danzer with page number
2. Below Standard--General idea from Danzer, no page
1. Ick--No evidence or inaccurate evidence.
Insight (5, 3, 1 "points" listed below)
5. You clearly explain the compelling connection between your source material, the ideas in the text and the EQ. You indicate how point of view and/or historiography plays a role in the connection. You show how the source material(s) deepen a point in the text or extend an idea omitted by the text.
3. You explain the connection between your source material, 1-2 major ideas in the text and the EQ.
1. You do not explain how your statements connect to the text.
Welcome to the wiki HW space for 4th marking period. Our goals are:
- to develop independent research skills
- to improve your analytical skills
- to maximize our talents in/through group work
- to have more fun as we learn!
Wiki Essential Questions- How can I approach this problem creatively? (hint: Wikipedia is not creative)
- How can I work with my classmates to construct best answer?
- What makes a good answer? (What makes an answer good?)
- How should I be graded?
- How can I help the wiki be effective as a teaching and learning tool?
___Rubric
Evidence (5 point scale)
5. Outstanding--Primary Sources with expert analysis
4. Strong--Secondary source(s) or expert analysis
3. Meets Standard--Quote from Danzer with page number
2. Below Standard--General idea from Danzer, no page
1. Ick--No evidence or inaccurate evidence.
Insight (5, 3, 1 "points" listed below)
5. You clearly explain the compelling connection between your source material, the ideas in the text and the EQ. You indicate how point of view and/or historiography plays a role in the connection. You show how the source material(s) deepen a point in the text or extend an idea omitted by the text.
3. You explain the connection between your source material, 1-2 major ideas in the text and the EQ.
1. You do not explain how your statements connect to the text.